Man at the spa getting a facial laser treatment - stock photo; Handsome man at the spa getting a facial laser treatment - beauty concepts
13 Mar 2025

The Dec. 31, 2024, phase out of Laser Notice No. 50 means manufacturers must transition to the new notice to remain compliant

U.S. Federal Drug Administration (FDA) Laser Notice No. 56 introduces critical updates for laser device compliance, reflecting a shift towards aligning FDA regulations with international standards. Understanding these changes is essential for medical device manufacturers to ensure compliance and maintain a competitive edge in a global market. This blog explores the key updates, differences from the previous Laser Notice No. 50, and the requirements manufacturers must meet to remain compliant.

Overview

Laser Notice No. 56 replaces the long-standing Laser Notice No. 50, which had been in use for many years. The new notice introduces the adoption of international standards, specifically IEC 60825-1 Edition 3.0 and IEC 60601-2-22 Edition 3.1. These standards represent the latest advancements in laser safety and performance requirements. The transition allows manufacturers to follow specific clauses from these international standards instead of complying with certain sections of the FDA’s performance standards outlined in 21 CFR 1040.10 and 1040.11. This alignment with international norms simplifies the compliance process for manufacturers who distribute products globally.

One of the primary benefits of Laser Notice No. 56 is the reduction of testing redundancies. By aligning with international standards, manufacturers can conduct a single set of tests that meet the requirements of multiple markets. This reduces the time and cost associated with separate compliance efforts for the U.S. and other regions. The FDA’s approach also helps manufacturers bring products to market faster, which is particularly important in the highly competitive medical device industry. The ability to harmonize compliance efforts makes it easier for companies to focus on innovation and quality.

The differences between Laser Notice No. 50 and Laser Notice No. 56 are clear and impactful. Under Laser Notice No. 50, manufacturers adhered to older editions of IEC standards, which have since been updated. Laser Notice No. 56 reflects these updates, incorporating new safety and performance requirements that are more robust and reflective of current technological advancements. Additionally, Laser Notice No. 56 sets a clear deadline for compliance. Laser Notice No. 50 was officially phased out on December 31, 2024, requiring manufacturers to transition to the new notice to remain compliant. Adoption is critical to avoid disruptions in product approvals and market access.

The notice allows the use of IEC 60825-1 and IEC 60601-2-22 to demonstrate compliance, but this requires careful attention to detail. These standards address critical aspects of laser safety and performance, including the classification of laser products, energy output, beam stability, and labeling requirements. Manufacturers must ensure their devices meet these standards and are accurately classified. Labeling is particularly important, as devices must include a statement indicating compliance with the FDA’s performance standards except for conformance with the IEC standards as described in Laser Notice No. 56.

The transition to Laser Notice No. 56 underscores the importance of robust testing for medical lasers. Proper testing not only ensures compliance but also plays a vital role in protecting patient safety. Medical lasers are used in a wide range of applications, from surgery to diagnostics, and their safety and performance are critical. Testing evaluates key factors such as energy output, beam accuracy, and stability to ensure the device functions as intended. These tests verify that the device delivers precise and consistent results while minimizing risks to patients and operators. Comprehensive testing also identifies potential issues early in the development process, reducing the likelihood of costly recalls or delays.

In addition to safety and performance testing, manufacturers must consider other compliance factors for medical lasers. Biocompatibility testing is essential to ensure that materials used in the device do not pose risks to patients. Usability engineering is another critical aspect, ensuring the device can be operated safely and effectively by medical professionals. These considerations go beyond regulatory requirements and contribute to the overall quality and reliability of the device. By addressing these factors during the development process, manufacturers can enhance their products and build trust with healthcare providers and patients.

Challenges

The transition to Laser Notice No. 56 does present some challenges for manufacturers. One common challenge is the potential for misinterpretation of the updated standards. The differences between the FDA’s traditional requirements and the IEC standards can lead to confusion if not fully understood. This is why it is crucial for manufacturers to work with experienced testing and certification partners who are familiar with both sets of requirements. Another challenge is the need for detailed technical documentation. Manufacturers must provide comprehensive records of their compliance efforts, including test results, risk assessments, and labeling information. Incomplete or inaccurate documentation can delay regulatory approvals and market entry.

The adoption of Laser Notice No. 56 presents a valuable opportunity for medical device manufacturers to enhance their compliance strategies and align with international standards. This alignment not only streamlines regulatory processes but also demonstrates a commitment to global best practices, boosting a company’s reputation and competitive edge. Early adoption of these standards allows manufacturers to optimize testing and certification processes, reducing costs and accelerating time-to-market while ensuring devices meet the highest standards of safety and performance. By embracing the changes introduced by Laser Notice No. 56, companies can position themselves for success in a rapidly evolving industry and build trust with healthcare providers and patients alike.

Key Takeaways

To summarize, Laser Notice No. 56 represents an important step forward for medical laser compliance. The adoption of updated international standards simplifies the regulatory process and promotes innovation while maintaining the highest levels of safety and performance. Manufacturers must act now to transition to the new requirements and ensure their devices comply with Laser Notice No. 56. By prioritizing robust testing and documentation, companies can navigate the changes with confidence and deliver high-quality, reliable products to the market. The transition to Laser Notice No. 56 is not just a regulatory requirement but an opportunity to enhance product quality, build trust, and drive success in the medical device industry.

*Note: Remember that, in general, FDA’s guidance documents do not establish a legal requirement. It is more of a recommendation unless a specific requirement is cited. These guidance documents are meant as suggestions or recommendations only.

Jessica Smith headshot
Jessica Smith

Senior Project Engineer, Intertek

Jessica has been testing medical devices with Intertek for more than 18 years, learning the industry first-hand in one of the largest and most advanced testing facilities in New England. She was a pioneer in testing and evaluation of electroencephalography instruments and today is a CB Scheme and ASCA reviewer in most of the medical categories as well as a regional lead engineer for Endoscopes and High Frequency Surgical Equipment. She has been an active participant in both AAMI and the IEC – being a committee member and part of the MT17 sub-committees focused on High Frequency Surgical Equipment. Jessica is one of Intertek's Laser Standard Reviewers and Laser Safety Officers who assists with ensuring the evaluation of devices with lasers in them is conducted safely and correctly at the evaluating facility.

You may be interested in...